The latest concept in dating and dining: Speed Plating
Chef Danny Boome tries something new
By Antoine Craigwell
Celebrity Chef Danny Boome’s concept of “speed plating”, a take on combining speed dating with dinner, was a welcome change from some of the tired old three-minute dating routines. At Tree & Garden restaurant in the upper East Village on Tuesday evening, more than 40 people gathered to sample Boome’s creations, in four courses, and to engage in an unusual activity: in as much time as it takes to complete eating a course to match and connect four different people with each other. The guests for the dinner, selected from marketing promotions, included public relations executives, representatives from the media, teachers, non-profit administrators, lawyers, doctors, and music producers.
According to Boome’s bio on dannyboome.tv, the celebrity chef from Food Network’s Rescue Chef, started his culinary training in 1999 as a cook in Switzerland, while as an au pair for a local family. After training at the West Wind Inn in Canada, he attended the Grange Cookery School in England. Following his culinary training, he started out as a young chef at the fashionable Asia de Cuba restaurant in St. Martins Lane London Hotel, where he recognized his passion for fusion cooking, the concept of concentrated ingredients with intense flavors being blended with select others to produce enhanced or amplified tastes. Boome launched his television career in 2004 on UKTV Food’s co-production Wild and Fresh for which he travelled across Canada to obtain the best home-grown ingredients and produce each province had to offer. Returning to England, he hosted Danny By the Sea, Coastal Kitchen and Local Food Heroes, and was a regular cooking feature ITV’s Summer This Morning. Boome became the “Rescue Chef” in 2008.
After being plied with copious amounts of champagne and lychee flavored drinks, the guests, introduced themselves to each other, and began the process of getting to know each other, preempting the formalized introductory process. The ladies were ushered first into the restaurant’s back garden seating area, where on a summer evening, the temperature was just right, neither stiflingly hot and humid nor prematurely chilly. Each man was given an envelope with a number printed on a card when he arrived, followed, and found his place opposite a woman at a numbered table. Throughout the dinner, Tree’s wait staff responded by ensuring that glasses were topped up with either red or white wine, politely and unobtrusively serving the courses, and clearing the tables.
Before serving the appetizer, Boome in his announcement of the process for the evening made a singularly significant request. He asked that the ladies refrain from using their cell phones and not to place them on the tables, which hinted at the trend where people at dinner or sharing meals spent time on their phones texting or in conversation, rather than with their dining companions. One diner suggested that sharing a meal with someone who preferred to text or be on their phone was not only rude, but showed a blatant disregard and disrespect to the person with whom they were supposedly sharing the meal.
Then the first course, a shared dish, arrived. It was pan seared asparagus with saffron aioli and grilled artichokes with horseradish mayo. The asparagus, tender, and saffron aioli and horseradish mayo presented easily identifiable flavors, teasing the palate, but a quick glance around the garden suggested that many didn’t quite take to the artichokes. Conversation between the pairs at tables seemed spirited and many seemed to be genuinely entering into the spirit of the evening by getting to know the person opposite, and regarding the experience as trying something new, something different.
When this course had ended, the men were again given cards with table numbers and asked to proceed to their new dates. The second course which followed, as Broome explained, depended on a person’s taste buds, which consisted of a new experience for everyone. The women were given blindfolds and their male eating companions fed lychee, poached pear in red wine, and liver pate on crackers to them and then repeated for the men. While this experience played with and challenged the senses, coming so soon after being introduced to someone for the first time, it required leaps of trust in the person sitting opposite feeding another food, and raised questions of how people responded to each other along with the bonds and commonalities food creates.
The third course, preceded again by numbered cards given to the men who changed places and had the opportunity to eat and speak with a different woman, featured either seared scallops on a bed of wasabi and mashed avocado drizzled with lemon grass oil or lamb cutlets with a side of roman salad, grilled zest polenta and hot fig jus. Everyone it seemed enjoyed this course, commenting that the scallops and the lamb cutlets were tasty. Instead of the usual litany of questions, conversation at one table, for instance, centered on a discussion of the Patriot’s Act, the U.S. Constitution and probable cause, and the case for the mosque near where the World Trade Center towers once stood. But as a result of one of the diner’s position within city government and the presence of press at the event, there was a reticence to speak more openly. During this course, creating a moment of mirth for one of the ladies, and to his obvious embarrassment, her dinner partner’s chair back tilted away from him, and he went into a slow fall over to another guest, appearing intoxicated, as if he had too much wine.
After the meat course, another numbered card followed with the men having to change places for dessert. This course, as with the first, was also shared, and seemed to bring the dinner full circle. It consisted of lemon grass and ginger panacotta, chili chocolate dipped strawberries, baked figs and fresh cream, finished with ginger snap cookies topped with mango chutney. While spooning mouthfuls of pancetta or sampling the chutney, conversation at one table was focused on one of the participants, a psychiatrist, and talked of how as a professional she separated the work side of who she is from her personal self when participating in an event such as this.
At the dinner’s end, the guests were invited to exchange information with those with whom they would like to remain in contact. As an observation, several of the female guests had come to the dating dinner with their close friends, where at least two groups of three women knew each other well and could be seen after the dinner comparing notes about their respective dinner partners.
A Review of “Obama’s” National HIV/AIDS Strategy: Will it Benefit Black People?
by Cleo Manago
(Taken from a posting on Facebook)
(Jul 15, 2010) – On Tuesday, Jul 13, 2010, president Obama presented the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) for the United States. According to his administration, the NHAS is a concise plan for moving the country forward in the fight against HIV and AIDS with three primary goals: reducing HIV incidence, increasing access to care and optimizing health outcomes, and reducing HIV-related health disparities.
The NHAS is a good first start for America. What I appreciate about the strategy is its’ unprecedented existence. No other administration has created a White House Office of National HIV/AIDS Policy, or has had so many progressive people in its midst. (The NHAS is now available to the public: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/NHAS.pdf).
Theoretically, this is a history making initiative. However, upon close review, NHAS content features elements that are not necessarily signs of innovation or a framework shift in terms of how HIV services may roll out or be resourced. It appears that the strong [white] gay identity bias (to be explained in more detail later) will continue to skew attempts at culturally diversifying how HIV services are framed, funded and prioritized.
Though diverse groups in America are impacted by HIV/AIDS, blacks, by a large percentage, are more impacted than all other groups in the country. Yet, deciphering this could be a challenge as presented in this NHAS excerpt, “While anyone can become infected with HIV, some Americans are at greater risk than others. This includes gay and bisexual men of all races and ethnicities, black men and women, Latinos and Latinas, people struggling with addiction, including injection drug users, and people in geographic hot spots, including the United States South and Northeast, as well as Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. By focusing our efforts in communities where HIV is concentrated, we can have the biggest impact in lowering all communities’ collective risk of acquiring HIV.”
This NHAS passage also abstracts the disproportionate depth of HIV in black communities by bundling everyone as “Communities where HIV is concentrated.” This passage, “While anyone can become infected with HIV, some Americans are at greater risk than others. This includes gay and bisexual men of all races and ethnicities…” muddles the fact that – by leaps and bounds – black men, specifically, are the most HIV impacted group in the United States. Yet, what is not abstract is how much the NHSA affirms gay identity, despite that many homosexual and bisexual men of color don’t identify with or as gay. Over the last 30 years, this gay identity bias and barrier has been a contributing factor to diverse black men at HIV sexual risk not seeking HIV services or internalizing prevention messages.
While Obama’s White House is committing resources and efforts to initiatives like HIV/AIDS and healthcare, the explicit context of race and culture continues to be overlooked.
The first HIV/AIDS services paradigm in America was designed by white gay men, and ultimately was very effective for that community. Despite the relative success of the white gay community at saving itself from HIV/AIDS, a once frequently deadly disease, the disease has since gotten blacker and blacker. To date, there are no published examples of similar HIV success among African Americans. Even after three decades. Not to mention, gay identified men – black and white – have controlled and directed this epidemic, and blamed its failure to blacks simply on “homophobia.”
The organization identified as the Black AIDS Institute once featured an article stating, “Homophobia Causes AIDS (http://www.blackaids.org/ShowArticle.aspx?articletype=NEWS&articleid=168&pagenumber=1).” Yet, if this was true, given the still very present existence of the rabidly anti-homosexual white right-wing – Pat Roberson, Rush Limbaugh, the legacy of Jerry Falwell and most republicans – the white gay community should still have an HIV problem – equal if not similar to African Americans. But they don’t.
Frequently, within the black HIV industry, while black gay identity and “pride” (in being gay identified) are often encouraged, engagement of the symptoms of social injustice toward black communities and self-concept, cultural affirmation, repair and restoration are very rarely included as HIV problem-solving strategies. The white gay community understood one thing: in order to eradicate the numbers of new HIV cases they had to empower their community, while at the same time address the self-esteem damage done by homophobia, discrimination, hatred and oppression. Their primary HIV prevention strategy was (because, ultimately, most finally knew how HIV was transmitted) to publicly and actively resist social injustice toward their community, and affirm [white] gay identity. As a result, it has been comparatively (to all others) very successful at managing HIV/AIDS.
Unfortunately and concurrently, the white gay community has had little interest in resisting [white] racism within its community or society as a whole, just homophobia. And the black gay-identifying movement and approach (including within HIV services) has taken on that same paradigm; not an approach that is directly relevant to black culture, history, circumstance, problem-solving, diversity, process and under-engagement of relevant black issues. “Gay” acceptance is often more important than issues directly relevant to diverse black life, culture, history and healing. As a result, many black gay identified HIV leaders have become ill-equipped to address black community issues, to counter the risk behavior inducing impact of internalized racism, institutionalized racism, black male or female trauma and white biases internalized by [black] America.
Essentially identity politics have superseded capacity to effectively engage diverse black subgroups and communities facing disproportionate HIV threats. The NHAS, while strong on affirming gay identity, fails to affirm black specific culture, diversity and relevance.
The gay paradigm creates little to no encouragement for same-gender loving (SGL) and bisexual African American healing and cultural affirmation. Being limited to “gay” has created HIV issue disenchantment among Black men who have sex with men (MSM). As a result, black homosexual subgroups have emerged in an attempt to connect more with the rhythms of black life and culture. Many black homosexual and bisexual males do not have an affinity with gay identity and culture, seeing it as white or culturally unrelated. There are “homo-thugs,” men on the “down-low,” and more in the affirmative men who identify as same-gender-loving (SGL) or bisexual. If more space was created for homosexual and bisexual black males to be fluid and “black” regarding their identity, more would likely self-identify.
In the late 1980s, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discovered that the term or label “gay” was a barrier in getting black and Latino men to identify as men who had sex with men, and disclose HIV risk factors. As a result, the now widely used term MSM, or men-who-have-sex with men was derived. Initially, white gays and black homosexuals who internalized the gay politic balked at the term, claiming it was homophobic. The fact of the matter was the term MSM was more neutral in terms of identity, inclusive and culturally responsive to the diverse ways of being among homosexual and bisexual black men.
A footnote excerpt from the NHAS states: “Throughout this document we use the terms “gay and bisexual men” and “gay men” interchangeably, and we intend these terms to be inclusive of all men who have sex with men (MSM); even those who do not identify as gay or bisexual.” In other words, even if you are not gay, or don’t identify as gay, or don’t want to, we are referring to all homosexual and bisexual men as gay regardless. This is not helpful to African Americans and is an example of an institutionally racist barrier to life and ways of being very present within black communities.
Sure, many of us are used to simply calling all homosexuals gay. In the black community this is not the result of an identify poll taken in the community, but because SGL black people have rarely been rationally engaged in a Black community context. While the powerful white gay community vigilantly profiles its gay idenity politics and ideas, this does not necessarily represent all homosexual and bisexual Black people.
Without these considerations or an examination of the relationship cultural barriers have to HIV risks among Black women and men, the NHAS will likely have limited impact on advancing the Black HIV landscape. As a result it may be discreetly shelved by many Black organizations.
While the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) for the United States does represent a potentially progressive step forward, its’ lack of specific strategies for African Americans has resulted in some response. National organizations are in the process of generating recommendations to the president as an addendum to the historic NHAS. All African Americans interested in getting involved or contributing somehow to this effort are earnestly invited to do so. If interested in contributing call The National Black Leadership Commission on AIDS (NBLCA) at 800-992-6531, or the Black Men’s Xchange National at 888-472-2837
HIV/AIDS orgs respond to Obama’s HIV/AIDS Strategy
Following release of National HIV/AIDS Strategy
By Antoine Craigwell
(Wednesday, July 14, 2010) – Paul Kawata, executive director of the National Minority AIDS Council, posted on the social networking site, Facebook, a letter signed by 180 national and community organizations at the forefront of the fight against HIV and AIDS. This letter was in response to the announcement and release of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) yesterday.
The text of the letter below:
Honorable Barack H. Obama
President, United States Of America
The White House
Washington, DC
Dear President Obama,
On behalf of the180 national and community based organizations (see list below) on the front lines of this epidemic, thank you for your leadership and commitment to fight the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Each of us stands here in the footprints of so many heroes we’ve lost to HIV/AIDS. Our friends who fought so hard in the early days could probably never imagine a President holding a reception at the White House to honor the HIV/AIDS community. Most would have loved to be part of this event. We miss them and will never forget the sacrifices they made so that we can be here today.
In the first 18 months of your administration the travel ban on those living with HIV was removed, restrictions on the use of federal funds to support needle exchange were removed, the Ryan White Care Act was reauthorized, and $30.4 Million was set aside as part of the Prevention and Wellness Fund for HIV/AIDS Prevention. However, we’ve also had our challenges in ensuring adequate funding for PEPFAR and other international HIV/AIDS initiatives.
As you implement the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS), we ask that the first thing you address is the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) funding crisis. We appreciate the $25 million to see us through September 30, 2010. We are concerned that is not a long-term solution and will only get us through a limited period. As of Jul 8, 2010, 2,291 individuals are on waiting lists. This number does not include individuals in states that don’t keep waiting lists, have significantly reduced the drug formulary, or have significantly changed the income eligibility levels. On Jul 1, Georgia became the 12th state to close enrollment and start a waiting list. Ohio changed its income eligibility levels so that more then 1,000 HIV/AIDS patients will lose their benefits. New Jersey also changed its income eligibility levels so that 947 HIV/AIDS patients will lose their benefits. Without an immediate solution, other states will follow.
As you consider solutions, please make it [funding for ADAP] multi-year funding through 2014, support states that don’t keep waiting lists but have closed enrollment or that are on the brink of a waiting list, ensure that all the necessary drugs are covered, and [the] integration of a permanent solution into health care reform.
We look forward to the reviewing the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and the opportunity to work with your administration to ensure its implementation across the country. Thank you for your support and leadership.
Sincerely,
2 God B The Glory, Inc A Brave New Day A Family Affair
ACT UP Philadelphia Action for a Better Community Advocates For Youth
African American Hispanic Health Education Resource Center
AID For AIDS Nevada AIDS Alabama
AIDS Alliance for Children, Youth & Families
AIDS Care Services, Inc. AIDS Community Research Initiative of America
AIDS Foundation of Chicago AIDS/HIV Services Group (ASG)
The AIDS LIFE Campaign AIDS Resource Center of Wisconsin
AIDS Project of Central Iowa AIDS Resources of Rural Texas
AIDS Treatment Activists Coalition (ATAC) Albany Damien Center
Amanda Beck-Myers Ananias Anxiety Disorders Association of America
Asian Media Access Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum
Asian & Pacific Islander Coalition on HIV/AIDS
Asian & Pacific Islander Wellness Center
Aspirations Wholistic Tutorial Services Baton Rouge AIDS Society
Bienestar Human Services Black AIDS Institute
The Black Women’s Health Imperative Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS
Paul Browne CAEAR Coalition CALOR
Camden NJ Area Health Education Center (AHEC)
Camillus Health Concern, Inc. CARES CareSouth Carolina
Cascade AIDS Project Central City AIDS Network, Inc.
Central Illinois FRIENDS of People with AIDS
CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers
William H. Chastang Consumer Advocate/Outreach Coordinator
Christie’s Place, Inc. Citywide Project/Citywide Ministries
Coai, Inc. Community Access National Network
Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project (CHAMP)
Community Information Center, Inc. Comprehensive Health Education
Connecticut AIDS Resource Coalition DeKalb Prevention Alliance, Inc
Desert AIDS Project Gregory W. Edwards, EdD
Eternal Hope Community Development Corporation, Inc.
Family Heath & AIDS Care Services International Family Health Project
Family Planning Association of Puerto Rico F.L.A.S., INC.
Fort Worth Northside Community Health Center, Inc.
Greater Love Tabernacle Gregory House Programs GROUP Ministries, Inc.
Harlem United Community AIDS Center Harmony House, Inc.
Hawaii Island HIV/AIDS Foundation Hermanas de Luna y Sol HEROES
HIV/AIDS Alliance for Region Two, Inc.
HIV/AIDS Services for African Americans in Alaska HIV-AIDS UETS
HIV Care Program HIVictorious, Inc.
HIV Planning Council Santa Clara County Housing Works
Illinois Alliance for Sound AIDS Policy Iris House
Johns Hopkins Local Performance Site
PA/MidAtlantic AIDS Education and Training Center
Monica Johnson, NMAC Board Member
Lambda Legal Lark Lands, M.S., Ph.D. H.O.P.E.
The LaStraw, Inc. Latino Commission on AIDS
Latino Community Services
Helen Lemay, Distinguished Teaching Professor Emerita, Stony Brook University
Liberty Research Group
Don Little, MPH, Former Chair of the Oklahoma Native American AIDS Coalition
The Living Room LMPHW Specialty Clinic
Love Heals, the Alison Gertz Foundation for AIDS Education
Lower East Side Harm Reduction Center
Kentucky HIV/AIDS Advocacy Action Group
Michigan Positive Action Coalition (MI-POZ)
Minnesota AIDS Project
Minority AIDS Council of Orangeburg, Bamberg, and Calhoun Council, Inc.
Missoula AIDS Council M OCHA Center Inc.
Multicultural AIDS Coalition, Inc. he NAMES Project/AIDS Memorial Quilt
Native Health National African American Drug Policy Coalition, Inc.
National AIDS Fund National AIDS Housing Coalition
National Association of People with AIDS
National Association of Social Workers
National Latino AIDS Action Network National Minority AIDS Council
National Native American AIDS Prevention Center
NCLR/CSULB Center for Latino Community Health, Evaluation and Leadership Training
New Jersey Women and AIDS Network New Destiny Recovery Ministry
New York AIDS Coalition New York City AIDS Housing Network
Nightsweats & T-cells, Co North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition
Oklahoma City Indian Clinic One Heartland One Love Project
Open Door Clinic Leonardo Ortega, NMAC Board Member
David G. Ostrow, MD, PhD Partnership Project
Choyce Perkinds, Advocate For AAHHERC Positive Efforts, Inc
Project Aware at Stanley Street Treatment & Resources
PROCEED, Inc. Project HANDLE, Neighborhood House Project Lazarus
Project Link of South Florida, Inc. Proyecto SOL Filadelfia
Puerto Rico Community Network for Clinical Research on AIDS (PR CoNCRA)
Andre Weatherby Rawls Recovery 2000, Inc. Redemption Outreach Intl
Regional AIDS Project
Genevieve Rohan, FNP-C, AAHIVMS and Tegest Hailu, MD, AAHIVMS, Hailu/Rohan Family Practice
SAYFSM Vanessa Sasso, Seattle HIV/AIDS Planning Council
Shanti
S.H.A.P.E. (Stop HIV/AIDS and Addiction through Prevention and Education)
Carlton R. Smith, Baltimore Black Pride, Inc. Founder, Churches United Against AIDS; Board chair
South Carolina Campaign to End AIDS (SC-C2EA)
South Central Educational Development, Inc. South Jersey AIDS Alliance
South LA Access Center Southern AIDS Coalition (SAC)
Southwest Louisiana AHEC Stanley Street Treatment & Resources
Street Works St. Luke AME Church/ Treat Me Right Inc.
Suburban HIV/AIDS Consortium (SHAC)
TACTS-THE Association of Clinical Trials Services
Tampa-Hillsborough Action Plan C. Taylor
Ti-chee Native AIDS Prevention Project Rose Todd-Stanford
Total Health Awareness Team Treat Me Right Inc.
Treatment Access Expansion Project Treatment Action Group
Two Spirit Society of Denver U Can Do It 2!
Evelyn Ullah, NMAC Board Member Us Helping Us
Valley AIDS Information Network Inc.
Vermont CARES VillageCare
Volunteers of America Greater Baton Rouge
West County Health Centers, Inc. Who’s Positive Willis Center
The Women’s Collective Women’s Health Center
Women Together For Change Women Watch Afrika, Inc
Conflicting Sexuality: Exploring sexual abuse in the Internet age
An autobiography with online chat rooms
By Antoine Craigwell
(New York, NY) – Cybersex: The Play, morphed from a 10-year-old seed, as an idea in the mind of Jason Duvall Hunter, to finally growing into and becoming a tree that bloomed and bore fruit with a performance at the New York City Producer’s Club.
At the Producer’s Club, last Saturday night, Jul 10, more than 60 people gathered to share in Hunter’s dream of producing a play. A real estate broker by day and the play’s writer, producer, director, and sound and lighting master, Hunter was finally able to bring to the stage his vision of melding his story with current technology: exploring his sexual abuse as a child with his search for love and affection in Internet chat rooms.
“I’ve thought of this play for over 10 years and with the rise of the Internet and computers, this is also autobiographical where I explore sexual identity and conflict. It’s also an opportunity for me to create this using my own life experience as a template,” Hunter said.
CyberSex: The Play is an adult rated play, which describes in graphic detail the sexual escapades that people engage in online chat rooms. It features a cast and crew of 13, and consists of people of different racial backgrounds, who, according to Hunter, were chosen from an open casting call and is intended as a reflection of diversity in society.
The play, with Harmonica Sunbeam as the Online Host, began with introductions into Internet Chat Rooms by the character “YouMe69n” (a handle used by several of the characters), played and with dance sequences choreographed by FranCisco Vegas – in drag, Michael Smith, Oscar Salazar, Nick Dorvill, and DJ Baker as “Shine2Fine”. Using different chat room handles, the characters include “Boy1683n” played by Delvon Johnson, “ShavedFratboy” played by Yvette Quintero, “Kenny1744n” played by Tristan Sample, “Tyboy1215n” by Nemian Quaid, and “LindaSue49n” by Unique Mills. The play devolves into the story of David, played by Alton Alburo, dressed simply in a black T-shirt and pants, who interleaves into the play a monologue describing his seduction and rape when he was 8-years old by his older cousin.
FranCisco Vegas as "YouMe69n"
It is in Internet chat rooms that David turns to find his sexuality identity, to determine if he is gay, straight, or bisexual. And, it is by entering into the Chat Rooms, in six different scenes, that he encounters people who populate these Internet sites, and are not who they say or claim to be; that in fact, many are hiding their true selves behind masks and various costumes with attitudes and behaviors. He realizes that as he searches for meaning in the chat rooms, he is the only one being truthful.
David reveals toward the end that since he was raped, his sexual development has been stunted: although he has participated in several different sexual acts, including having a girlfriend who turned out to be a lesbian, and with many different people, the trauma of the rape has prevented him from ever achieving an orgasm.
A scene from a sex chat room
“I want people to come away from seeing this play with perceptions of themselves, to see in the people they know, the costumes and the masks people wear, and the lies people tell, especially the covers people use as they interact with each other online. This is basically an exploration of sexuality and sexual identity, and is a peeling away of the layers to reveal true selves,” said Hunter.
Sharing in the play’s production, associate producer Nathan James, a writer and advocate for and of the LGBT community, said that working with Hunter and Bill Johnson, the co-director, was a privilege to create a performance that is at once both provocative and groundbreaking.
“It is provocative in that it’s a play that steps outside the boundaries of convention and engages the audience with intriguing concepts regarding our sexual identity and some of our darker life experiences,” James said.
DJ Baker as "Shine2Fine"
Bill Johnson, 14 years as a director, who participated in productions such as “Colored Museum” by George C. Wolf, and “Bus Stop” by William Inge, said that he was glad to have been given the opportunity to give voice to Hunter’s personal story. He said he took the writer’s words to ensure that the story is told through direction, lighting, costumes, and props, which were minimal.
“It’s a good story. Unfortunately, molestation is too much part of life. Too many men have been molested and haven’t dealt with it, and don’t know how to deal with it. This play addresses this issue and I hope it opens some lines of communication,” the co-director said.
Hunter, who has been working on producing the play since January, had a
Alton Alburo as "David"
table reading in February this year and depending on the success of the play, plans to pursue an extended run for about three or four weeks in the Fall at a mid-level theater, such as the Helen Mills Theater or a theater with about 140 seats. His vision for the play’s future is that it would attract sponsors and with a bigger budget go off-Broadway or even ambitiously, to Broadway itself.
Christians must oppose all discrimination: Bishop Singh.
(Pastoral letter issued by Bishop Benedict Singh, Bishop of Georgetown, Guyana, on Jan 4, 2001, and reprinted in The Catholic Standard, a publication of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Georgetown Guyana, on Jul 9, 2010; editor Colin Smith.)
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Jesus Christ,
The Constitution of Guyana was amended by parliament on 4th January. One section of the amended Constitution of Guyana prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and marital status. Some Christians are vigorously opposing this element in the amended Constitution on the grounds that it is an “official endorsement and national approval of sexual perversion”.
When dealing with questions that generate strong emotions, we need to be careful and precise with our choice of language. First, we must note that what is at issue here is not discrimination against homosexuality but discrimination against PERSONS who are homosexuals. We need to remind ourselves that as Christians we are called to oppose every kind of discrimination against persons. We are called to reach out to all minorities and especially to those who find themselves in a minority they did not choose…..
Most of us, whether we find ourselves sexually attracted to the opposite sex or our own sex, did not choose one or the other: we simply discovered that is how we are. Homosexual persons are sexually attracted solely to their own gender. There is strong evidence that their orientation is fixed early in life (in many cases before birth), and it is totally outside of their control. Experience has taught us that no therapy or counseling can change it….
As Christians, we are called by the Lord to love our neighbour. They are our brothers and sisters, children with us of the one Father. We do not show them that we regard them as brothers and sisters if we do nothing to remove the discrimination which they undoubtedly suffer.
In society at large – and in our church – there are homosexual men and lesbian women who lead useful and virtuous lives. Many of them show an active concern for justice and for the plight of the needy which is an example to all of us. In the face of the discrimination they encounter, some of them can be described as truly heroic.
Some allege that to outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is to “open the flood-gates “to all kinds of “corrupt and ungodly sexual practices”. Undoubtedly, if this amendment stands as it is and its effects are worked out, we Christians will have to define and proclaim our beliefs and moral standards with regard to sexuality and we will not fear to do so.
We do believe that God himself is the author of marriage in which a man and a woman “are no longer two but one”. We believe that that act of sexual intercourse is the highest expression of that unity. So we hold that the intimate sexual act may only be exercised between a man and a woman joined in the unbreakable union of marriage. Further, we believe that all Christians are called to actively promote the values of marriage and the
family among people of every race and religion and sexual orientation.
But our support for marriage and the family is not helped by discrimination against any person. It is not sufficient to merely refrain from active discrimination. We have to show others that we love and respect them as
persons. For these reasons, Christians should not oppose the wording of this amendment.
Finally, we should not allow ourselves to react to the attempts of others to bring more justice to our society with fear or irrational emotion. The Spirit of God is with us and he will enable us calmly and serenely to proclaim our faith and that justice which is an integral part of that faith.
Bishop Benedict Singh
We should not discriminate against Homosexuals
By Mike James
(Note: this article was extracted from The Catholic Standard, Jul 9, 2010, editor Colin Smith, published by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Georgetown, Guyana.)
A very interesting and often heated debate has developed in Guyana over the past two weeks on the issue of the rights of homosexuals following an impassioned critique by some members of the Inter Religious Organization
of a current film festival sponsored by the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) at the Side Walk Cafe in Georgetown and responses by other members of the IRO and members of the wider Guyanese public.
The debate revives the equally contentious issues surrounding the 4 January 2001 Constitutional Amendment approved in Parliament prohibiting discrimination against persons based on their race, age, sex, marital status, religion or sexual orientation.
Following strong lobbying led by some sectors of the religious community that the law would limit the rights of religious groups to discriminate against homosexuals, the President of Guyana declined to sign the amendment into law, and subsequently approved a revised constitutional amendment without sexual orientation being listed as one of the grounds on which discrimination is prohibited in Guyana.
It is notable at the time significant religious bodies, including the Roman Catholic and Anglican churches and other civil society groups publicly registered solid and dispassionate arguments for retaining the prohibition of discrimination on the grounds sexual orientation. It is also notable that the President bowed to the pressure of very vocal and agitated groups claiming the right to vilify and discriminate against homosexuals despite the fact that he himself had been subject a few short years previously to a sustained, disgraceful, uncharitable, obscene and totally unjustified public campaign of insults, mockery and contempt surrounding supposed allegations of his own sexual orientation.
For a good understanding of a Catholic perspective on the current controversy on homosexual rights in Guyana, the publication of the following excerpts from the excellent Pastoral Letter published by Bishop
Benedict Singh on the issue may be helpful. His concerns, ignored by the President and Parliament at the time, remain as valid today as they were then.
U.S. President announces national HIV/AIDS strategy
By Antoine Craigwell
(Tuesday, July 13, 2010) – Finally, U.S. President Barack Obama announced a National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) as a way of addressing the rising numbers of people in the U.S. who are HIV positive and living with AIDS.
President Obama meets with Jeffery Crowley, ONAP director.
Announcing the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, coordinated by the Office of National AIDS Policy (ONAP), the president said in a letter, “Thirty years ago, the first cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) garnered the world’s attention. Since then, over 575,000 Americans have lost their lives to AIDS and more than 56,000 people in the United States become infected with HIV each year. Currently, there are more than 1.1 million Americans living with HIV. Moreover, almost half of all Americans know someone living with HIV.”
The country is at a crossroads with HIV as a domestic epidemic demanding a renewed commitment, increased public attention, and leadership, the president said. He said he challenged the Office of National AIDS Policy at the start of his administration to develop a national strategy with three goals: reducing the number of people who become infected with HIV; increasing access to care and improving health outcomes for people living with HIV; and, reducing HIV-related health disparities.
“To accomplish these goals, we must undertake a more coordinated national response to the epidemic. The Federal government can’t do this alone, nor should it. Success will require the commitment of governments at all levels, businesses, faith communities, philanthropy, the scientific and medical communities, educational institutions, people living with HIV, and others,” Obama said.
ONAP in its vision statement said: “The United States will become a place where new HIV infections are rare and when they do occur, every person, regardless of age, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or socio-economic circumstance, will have unfettered access to high quality, life-extending care, free from stigma and discrimination.”
But leaders at the forefront in the fight against AIDS, especially in the Black community, suggest that the Strategy does not go far enough.
In a press release, Phill Wilson, president and chief executive officer of the Black AIDS Institute, on his organization’s Website said that the National AIDS Strategy represents a new day in the country’s nearly three-decade-long struggle against AIDS.
“For the first time, we finally have a national plan in place to guide our fight against the epidemic and to hold decision-makers accountable for results,” said Wilson.
Wilson pointed to the hypocrisy in the U.S. AIDS policy toward other countries, which imposed as a condition to receive AIDS assistance that they were required to have a national AIDS strategy, but America never had one.
“With no plan in place to mandate coordination between different government agencies or to ensure accountability, it is hardly surprising that we have an HIV/AIDS epidemic 40% worse than previously believed, with 1 in 5 Americans infected with HIV don’t know they have the disease, half or more of people diagnosed with HIV are not receiving regular medical care, and HIV rates in some communities worst than those found in some of the poorest countries on the planet,” Wilson said.
The new strategy provides a promising opportunity for Americans to get real about the shortcomings in its national response to the epidemic, he said. At a time when AIDS deaths are largely preventable, the government has provided only minimal leadership in making knowledge of HIV serostatus an essential social norm in the most heavily affected communities. And even though the face of AIDS in America is typically Black or brown, most people with HIV are forced to seek medical care from health providers who neither look like them nor understand the challenges they face. The new strategy provides a blueprint for changing some of these realities, and it is an opportunity we must energetically grasp, Wilson said in the release.
But, he said that while he praises the president for placing Black America front and center in his national HIV/AIDS strategy, AIDS in America today is a Black disease, which accounts for about 13% of the national population, with Black people making up half of all new HIV diagnoses. The AIDS death rate among Black males is eight times higher than for white males, while Black women are 19 times as likely to die as whites, he said.
Pointing to the limitations of the AIDS Stratefy, Wilson said, “If the new AIDS strategy is to succeed, it has to work for Black people. In reporting results, the Obama administration needs specifically to report outcomes for Black people. Only if prevention and treatment programs work for Black America will we win our national fight against AIDS. Unfortunately, the new strategy does not sufficiently address the issue of resources. Already, we are seeing many AIDS drug assistance programs impose caps or waiting lists for life-saving drugs. There are over 3000 people on ADAP waiting lists. This month, the President authorized a one-time funding increase for ADAP of $25 million, but this amount, while welcome, represents only about 7% of amounts needed this year alone to ensure the program’s continued solvency.
“At a time when we are largely losing the fight to prevent new infections, prevention programs currently account for only 3% of federal AIDS spending. To put available prevention weapons to effective use, experts estimate that annual prevention spending needs to increase from $750 million to $1.3 billion for at least each of the next five years. This new strategy offers a sound, evidence-based approach to better results, but it will be worth little more than the paper it is written on if we don’t follow through with essential resources.
“In difficult economic times, it is often necessary to make painful choices. As a country, though, we need to transition from AIDS “spending” to AIDS “investments.” By investing in cost-effective AIDS programs, we are investing in America’s families and helping young people remain productive contributors to society for future decades.”
Paul Kawata, executive director of the Washington-DC based National Minority AIDS Council (NMAC), in a statement said, “This is a historic time on many fronts. On the one hand, President Obama has made history today by being the first President ever to create a truly national strategy to deal with the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The ideas contained in this plan are aggressive and would certainly go a long way toward combating what continues to be one of our nation’s most troubling public health emergencies.”
Kawata said he purposefully used the word ‘plan’ to demonstrate that without the funds to carry out the president’s ambitious agenda, it significantly short of a strategy.
“The blueprint is most certainly there,” he said. “But now our collective attention must shift to resources.”
He said that while the president can rightly lay claim to a historic and much-needed moment in the HIV/AIDS movement, history continues to be made each day as more people living with HIV/AIDS continue to join the ranks of those waiting to receive life-saving medicines. Tragically, this has become an issue of resources as well—an issue that has become an all-too familiar refrain in the battle against this disease, he added.
“We must look at this plan as a solid first step in achieving our ultimate goal: eradicating HIV/AIDS. Now the conversation must turn to implementation—and how we fund such an audacious goal. To ignore the difficult topic of HIV/AIDS funding would be tantamount to placing the president’s strategy in a shredder,” said Kawata.
But, Jeffery Crowley, ONAP director, in a statement posted on the ONAP Website said, “Today, Secretary Sebelius also announced that $30 million of the Affordable Care Act’s Prevention Fund will be dedicated to the implementation of the NHAS. This funding will support the development of combination prevention interventions. It will also support improved surveillance, expanded, and targeted testing, and other activities.”
Among the many items the Strategy calls for is a three-step process of reducing HIV-related disparities and health inequities, which include reducing HIV-related mortality in communities at high risk for HIV infection, adopting community-level approach to reduce HIV infection in high-risk communities, and reducing stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV.
The Strategy said that regarding the third step of this process, in the earliest days of the HIV epidemic, fear, ignorance, and denial led to harsh, ugly treatment of people living with the disease, and some Americans even called for forced quarantine of all people living with HIV. Although such extreme measures never occurred, the stigma and discrimination faced by people living with HIV was often extremely high. Even today, some people living with HIV still face discrimination in many areas of life including employment, housing, provision of health care services, and access to public accommodations. This undermines efforts to encourage all people to learn their HIV status, and it makes it harder for people to disclose their HIV status to their medical providers, their sex partners, and even clergy, and others from whom they may seek understanding and support.
Time and again, an essential element of what has caused social attitudes to change has been when the public sees and interacts with people who are openly living with HIV. For decades, community organizations have operated speaker’s bureaus where people with HIV go into schools, businesses, and churches to talk about living with HIV. In the 1990s, both major political parties had memorable keynote speakers at their presidential nominating conventions that were living with HIV.
With Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and other civil rights laws commemorating their 20th anniversary this year, these laws have proven to be vital for the protection of people with disabilities including HIV. The Strategy calls for a greater commitment to civil rights enforcement and that to be free of discrimination based on HIV status is both a human and a civil right, “We know that many people feel shame and embarrassment when they learn their HIV status. And, there is too much social stigma that seeks to assign blame to people who acquire HIV. Encouraging more individuals to disclose their HIV status directly lessens the stigma associated with HIV. As we promote disclosure, however, we must also ensure that we are protecting people who are openly living with HIV.”
Working to end the stigma and discrimination experienced by people living with HIV is a critical component of curtailing the epidemic, said the Strategy document. People at high risk for HIV cannot be expected to, nor will they seek testing or treatment services if they fear that it would result in adverse consequences of discrimination. HIV stigma has been shown to be a barrier to HIV testing and people living with HIV who experience more stigma have poorer physical and mental health and are more likely to miss doses of their medication. An important step is to ensure that laws and policies support current understanding of best public health practices for preventing and treating HIV.
“While we understand the intent behind such laws, they may not have the desired effect and they may make people less willing to disclose their status by making people feel at even greater risk of discrimination. In some cases, it may be appropriate for legislators to reconsider whether existing laws continue to further the public interest and public health. In many instances, the continued existence and enforcement of these types of laws run counter to scientific evidence about routes of HIV transmission and may undermine the public health goals of promoting HIV screening and treatment,” the Strategy document said.
To reduce stigma and discrimination experienced by people living with HIV, the Strategy document recommends that communities be engaged to affirm support for people living with HIV: Faith communities, businesses, schools, community-based organizations, social gathering sites, and all types of media outlets should take responsibility for affirming nonjudgmental support for people living with HIV and high-risk communities. The promotion of public leadership of people living with HIV: Governments and other institutions (including HIV prevention community planning groups and Ryan White planning councils and consortia) should work with people with AIDS coalitions, HIV services organizations, and other institutions to actively promote public leadership by people living with HIV. The promotion of public health approaches to HIV prevention and care: State legislatures should consider reviewing HIV-specific criminal statutes to ensure that they are consistent with current knowledge of HIV transmission and support public health approaches to preventing and treating HIV. And, strengthening of enforcement of civil rights laws: The Department of Justice and federal agencies must enhance cooperation to facilitate enforcement of federal antidiscrimination laws.
Jamaican Folk Music and Dance Raises Rafters at NYC Hunter College
Celebrating Braata Folk Singers official launch
Braata Productions official launch program
(New York, NY) To the pulsating rhythms of drums, the sound of a tambourine and the distinct sharp notes from two keyboards, the ensemble that is Braata Folk Singers officially launched their group for all the world at a concert held on Sunday, Jun 27 at Lang Hall in Hunter College, City University of New York.
Dressed in traditional Jamaican costumes, the stage set with props reminiscent of a market place in rural Jamaica, the members of the ensemble of Braata Folk Singers: six men, five women and two children, danced and sang, and told stories of their homeland, people and culture in folk songs.
Although formed a year ago, the company, whose name is colloquial Jamaican for “a little bit more,” has been performing in and around New York City’s five boroughs, and the tri-state area. Its complement of 12 members is made up of students, teachers, and nurses, to name a few professions. With the formation of Braata Folk Singers, it has brought together talents and experience, which serve to expand the repertoire with folk genres such as Kumina, Bruckins, Dinki-Mini, Revival, Mento, Ring Games, Maroon, and Nine Night. This official launch was an occasion to establish the ensemble as a serious group within the Caribbean Diaspora and to the collection of West Indian cultural heritage groups here in the U.S.
Center, Braata Productions founder and director, Andrew Clarke
Founder and artistic director, Andrew Clarke said, “I am humbled …by the diverse and talented members of Braata Folk Singers who I have the pleasure of leading as I do my part in helping to build on the tradition and legacy of groups such as the Jamaican Folk Singers, Carifolk Singers, and the NDTC Singers, to name a few. I am particularly excited that the faces you will see and the voices you will hear entertain you …are those of the next generation, intent on upholding the rich tradition.”
Clarke said that for him, this official launch is like a father who has nurtured a child and is now sending that child to school for the first time.
“Sadly, I can’t continue to protect this child from the reality that exists in the world, but I take comfort in the fact that I have done a good job and they will make me proud,” said Clarke.
In a congratulatory letter to the ensemble, Member of Parliament and Minister of Youth and Sports Olivia Grange said that the government of Jamaica is always proud to acknowledge the work of Jamaicans abroad.
“Although Braata Folk Singers is merely a year old, the group has already established itself and it is expected that its first anniversary celebration concert will provide exceptional entertainment as it pays tribute to some of Jamaica’s cultural icons, including Louise Bennett and Professor Rex Nettleford,” said Grange.
The ensemble performed a collection of 27 folk songs, in one part those common to the market place, such as “Solas Market” and featuring food, and many social situations, including gossip, romance, justice, and commerce, as with the performance done by Ms. Jamaica USA 2009 Diane Johnson, who sang a moving rendition of “Saloh (Quattie a yawd)” which had similar strains to the peddler’s song from the production of “Oliver.” And, the rendition of “Ratta Maddan Law” seemed to carry in its arrangement hints of a folk song “Bamboo Fire” common in Guyana.
Following the 15-minute intermission, one of the ensemble assumed the role of and paid tribute to the late Dr. Louise Bennett-Coverly, DM (1919 – 2006). She performed a medley of songs, one of which “Dis Lang time gyal” is familiar across the Caribbean. As the narrator explained following the rendition of “Di Buggy Bruk” which lyrics were seemingly innocuous, in fact announced the abolition of slavery.
Then as if attending a spiritualist or revivalist gathering the women appeared dressed in long white dresses with different colored head and waist cloths, and the men with white shirts, black pants and colored head wraps and cummerbunds. Swaying to the rhythms of “Anywhere the army goes, Satan a follow” it seemed as if the ensemble were at a revivalist or spiritualist meeting, as they sang a Bible medley which included songs such as “Cock-a-crow, Peter gone,” “King David slew Goliath with a sling and a marble stone,” “Symbol a gon roll away,” and “Rolling down to Babylon.”
Audiences at the two shows, both of which nearly filled the 150-seat Lang Hall, expressed their appreciation and during many of the renditions, were heard giggling, laughing, and even applauding as the folk songs brought back memories of life in Jamaica.
Offering a slight comment contrary to the general sense of approval, Clifford Warmington, a Jamaican living in the U.S. for five years, said that while the production was good, the performances was as close to authentic and Jamaican as possible. He drew attention to a few minor technicalities, such as the choreography, “could have been a little tighter,” and at times some of the drumming seemed to overwhelm the voices of the singers. Explaining, he said that in some of the group dance movements, all were not sufficiently coordinated.
Warmington, an environmental scientist with a penchant for the arts, said, “Hearing folk songs take me back and I imagine for the older people in the audience how hearing these songs take them back.”
Braata Productions ensemble performing a revival piece
At the conclusion of the program, Clarke thanked the audience and those who were vital to the production and performance, including Ruth Brown, from Florida, who he said went shopping for the props and costumes and shipped them to him. He also thanked his co-director and musical director Garnet Christopher Lloyd Mowatt, who as a minister of music at Oakgrove CME Church in Water Valley, Mississippi, traveled once a month to New York for rehearsals, and those members of the ensemble who excelled with only a few weeks of rehearsal.
What Pride Means
The first time I was exposed to New York City pride, I decided I didn’t want to be that type of gay man. It appeared too celebratory, extravagant and vulgar. The parade didn’t reflect any part of me. I recoiled. Years went by, as I dismissed it it as a vehicle for certain aspects of the gay community that I didn’t identify with.
Now, as part of the Immigrant Social Action Group at the Center, my impression has been drastically changed. The year-long journey that brought me here has been life-altering, as desperation led to self-acceptance. In my case, self-acceptance opened my mind to all forms of diversity in sexual identity and gender identity. A large part of this was due to my presence inside the Center. It has been a wholesome and pleasurable womb for personal rebirth.
The themes of self-acceptance and wider acceptance emerged in our discussion[s] of what gay pride and the parades mean. Through my friends’ stories, I was taught how the celebratory nature of the parades have facilitated many gay immigrants’ acceptance of themselves. Stories were told that delighted me as I sat immersed in the camaraderie. One woman told of her first New York City gay pride, when she tremulously looked on, until a contingent of her fellow countrymen walked by in national wear and invited her into the parade. She jumped in, and immediately experienced a rebirth, and attainment of pride, in her sexual identity.
Another story told, was of a gay man who, newly arrived in the United States, was in San Francisco with a friend. They went to the pride parade, and were taken aback by the sight of gay men and women marching in public dancing and celebrating. It seemed the American Dream; it seemed everything they had come to America for. As they ran along the outside of the parade asking what it was, they were invited onto a Float. Two thin, brown men invited to dance on an all-white float. They melted into the celebration.
A third story came from a man of Caribbean descent who was afraid of being seen in public in the vicinity of the parade. His story reflected mine. After many years of living in fear, he finally broke free. He now marches proudly and openly. Another man, also from the Caribbean, spoke of his initial reluctance because of the pretentious atmosphere of the parade. Yesterday, he too reflected my impression. As he gradually learnt to accept himself, he became comfortable and accepting of others, so that today, he no longer sees the parade as a distortion of gay pride, but a valid celebration, to not only display our presence, but to invite the timid and unsure, and to entice those outside our community into a celebration, with lowered barriers of aversion.
There are still many barriers to be lowered. A significant portion of the intolerance we feel as gay immigrants comes from other settlers from our homelands, and other countries, who have brought bigotry with them. Even within New York City, we live with prejudice because we cannot afford to live elsewhere. It sometimes makes us feel resigned to failure in seeking a better life. This sentiment was shared by many in the room.
Even when those of us who find strength and courage to come out and immerse ourselves in gay-friendly parts of the City, do so, we encounter intolerance. This particular strain of intolerance is very hurtful because it comes from within the LGBT community itself. I personally know that identifying as gay doesn’t automatically lead to full acceptance by other LGBT individuals. At a recent celebration for gay pride, I witnessed racial tension between two individuals. I felt hurt. I went there expecting to see all facets of the LGBT rights movement under one banner regardless of each individual’s other identities. I was hoping to see unwavering acceptance. I was hoping to see public expression of the move beyond self-acceptance to acceptance of others. I came away disappointed, reeling from the reality of bigotry. Even as we ourselves struggle for acceptance, we sometimes fail to push our own insecurities away. I hear gay men mock lesbians and transgendered individuals. I hear macho-acting men berating effeminate men. I hear every possible distinction being used to discriminate. I feel deflated.
One of the storytellers spoke of coming to the US to escape living in the shadows of his society, but finds himself doing the same here. Yes, in coming into the borders, he no longer fears for his life because of his sexual orientation, but he finds it has been exchanged for other intolerances spread across many of his identities. He feels it against his complexion, he feels it against his effeminate manner, he feels it against his thick accent, he feels it against his muslim faith. The magnitude of the intolerance, he feels, remains the same. Another speaker feels it because she is also muslim, has a heavy accent, and because she is transgendered.
I mention this because it is, and has been, transgendered individuals, effeminate men, and macho-acting women who have been at the front lines of the fight for acceptance. No other choice exists for them. They, unlike many others who fit gender stereotypes, don’t have the luxury to hide behind mannerisms for convenience. So they absorb so much more. They also have to be stronger. It is for this that I force myself to accept all of us despite how insecure I feel, or how chipped, shattered or distorted we may have become in our personal struggles. The line between preference and discrimination is a fuzzy one, and it takes diligent vigilance to remain on the virtuous side of it.
I have heard the term ‘post-gay’ being used to describe individuals who have moved away from activism and live openly within the confines of the larger society. They have given up some of their identity to be accommodated. However, when I hear the term ‘post-gay’ this is what I imagine: a biologically diverse movement that is no longer a minority, but encompasses all sexual and gender identities. A place where we recognize and celebrate all gender non-conforming individuals who don’t have the luxury of hiding behind secondary identities, and who make the pride parade even more colorful and exuberant. Post gay will happen when the laws of the land truly reflect the real biological diversity that humans encompass. It is the lawful discrimination after all, that keeps so many of us living on the fringe of this society as it did in our countries of origin.
I am happy to have had the opportunity to connect with so many LGBT individuals from all countries, sexual preferences and personalities during my own healing process. Being open and accepting of others has helped me heal even further than I would have otherwise. As I walk in my first New York City Parade this Sunday, I will be wearing personal pride and celebrating reaching it. I will also be opening my mind to other expressions of sexuality and gender identity as I encounter them. The Social Action Group, comprised of all colors, ethnicities, sexual and gender identities, have pledged to uphold open acceptance in defending equality.
We will be marching, celebrating our renewed enthusiasm and pride in accepting not only all sexual identities, but all other facets of the LGBT community. We hope our celebration is seen and shared. We hope that our voices as diverse, undocumented, immigrants seeking a better life as LGBT individuals will be heard, understood, and given empathy and support. We feel strongly that our concerns encompass and reflect those of the larger LGBT community; that listening and giving support to our plights will bring awareness to the gamut of issues, and facilitate a wide-ranging healing process.
LGBT Seniors Have National Caregiver Resource Center
SAGE also launches ad campaign
By Antoine Craigwell
(New York, NY) – In a special event celebrating Pride month, more than 150 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) seniors and staff of Services and Advocacy for LGBT Elders (SAGE) gathered on Monday, Jun 14 at SAGE’s office for the launching of the National Caregiver Resource Center and ad campaign.
The National Caregiver Resource Center, a first in the country catering specifically to LGBT seniors, was made possible by a collaborative $900,000 grant over three years to 10 partner agencies around the country from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department for the Aging. These partner agencies are charged with providing training on LGBT issues, access to mainstream services and providers for seniors, and critically important educational tools and information for elderly LGBT people, including financial management, case and social worker assistance, and enabling access to addressing health and disability concerns.
“Our SAGECAP program provides an LGBT-affirming space where people who are going through the difficult time of providing care for a loved one can receive essential information and support,” said Michael Adams, executive director of SAGE. “SAGE’s city-wide ad campaign is meant to remind LGBT caregivers that they are not alone and that our SAGECAP services are there to help.”
Pat Parsons standing next to SAGE Resource Center sign
The press release added that the campaign’s ads would run as posters throughout the city’s Metropolitan Transit Authority subway and bus system from Jun 14 to Jul 26, as well as in print and online magazines, blogs, and in media that target the LGBT community throughout New York City. Animated versions of the ads will also run online. In all, it is expected that the campaign will be viewed more than 33 million times during the seven-week campaign period. Later this year, in preparation for November’s Caregiver Appreciation Month, SAGE will broaden the campaign to educate LGBT communities nationwide about the types of support caregivers could receive.
At the combined launch Adams said, “The National Resource Center is a huge breakthrough for the LGBT community because this is the first time that the federal government is providing support, federal benefits, for LGBT people across the country through service providers. The public education campaign, on the other hand, is an example of the kind of educational work the Resource Center would do. The ad campaign is to help caregivers for LGBT elders become aware of SAGE’s caregiver support program.”
Michael Adams, executive director, SAGE, and Sheila Bligen, retired Verizon employee
Although SAGE caters to LGBT elders 50 years and over, John “Marty” Young, an African-American who is two years shy of that goal, is already familiarizing himself with the organization’s services.
“I think it’s a great opportunity to meet the needs and to recognize that there exists a number of LGBT seniors who are invisible. This center acknowledges their existence and importance, especially with so much emphasis on youth these days,” said Young.
Lee Evans, 63-year old, who is a bisexual retired Broadway actor and singer, says that since he came out to his daughter and had to deal with different health issues including prostate cancer and rheumatoid arthritis, that SAGE has been able to help older LGBT people who are single.
“SAGE has given me an opportunity to come out of the closet and be comfortable,” he said
Adams said that seniors in the LGBT community are living in unprecedented times, especially for caregivers, healthcare facilities, and communities that serve them.
“Our country is witnessing the first generation in history to live and age more openly as LGBT people. Going into the closet to access vital services isn’t an option,” said Adams.
Another senior, Shelia Bligen, 59, who is retired from Verizon, says that although she has been with SAGE for two years, she always knew about the organization, from their women’s dances.
“SAGE is an outlet where I can give back. I volunteer and make use of the available programs, including computer services and opportunities to attend the opera. To me the resource center means I could refer friends and others to SAGE because a lot of people don’t know of the organization,” said Bligen.
Three seniors chatting after the launch
Cathy Renna, of Renna Communications, the firm handling public relations for SAGE, said, “This campaign follows last year’s highly successful and award-winning LGBT older adult visibility campaign with the message that “there’s no expiration date on a full and active life.”
Renna added that the world famous photographer Janette Beckman, who has shot photos of rock stars and hip-hop artists for Rolling Stone magazine for the past two decades, has turned her lens on SAGE members, donors, staff and volunteers.
“Janette and Double Platinum, the award-winning gay and lesbian focused marketing agency owned by Arthur Korant and Stephanie Blackwood, have put a positive and hopeful face on LGBT aging,” said Renna.
Barbara Russel, at left, greeted by Lawrence Lala, seated.
While the Resource Center is official, SAGE is in the process of identify appropriate staff, including a director, and later this year, plans to launch a Website which would provide vital information to LGBT elderly audiences to ensure that seniors are supported all over the country.
Your Writer – chronicling
Image attribution: Google Images - Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam
Antoine\’s clips
Expressing my view! 
You must be logged in to post a comment.